WebAug 29, 2005 · In Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So.2d 1310, 1313 (Fla. 1981), our supreme court approved a district court decision reversing for a new trial because an unlisted witness had been permitted to testify, and stated explicitly "that a trial court can properly exclude the testimony of a witness whose name has not been disclosed in … WebFeb 9, 1994 · Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1981), squarely places decisions regarding the testimony of improperly disclosed witnesses within the broad discretion of the trial judge, who is vested with the interpretation and enforcement of any pretrial order mandating witness disclosure. Id. at 1313.

Trial court did not abuse discretion in striking bank

WebMay 9, 2001 · See Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310, 1313 (Fla.1981); Florida Marine Enterprises v. Bailey, 632 So. 2d 649, 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Grau v. Branham, 626 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). IV. We next conclude that the trial court should not have directed a verdict in favor of the insured. There must be a new trial. Web401 So.2d at 1314. Nevertheless, the trial court is afforded broad discretion in deciding whether an undisclosed witness should be allowed to testify. William Sayad v. James … orange color magick

Stephanie Dussan, Appellant, v. Ahmed El Zoghbi, Appellee. (2024)

Webiii TABLE OF CITATIONS Cases Page(s) Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 WebJul 24, 1991 · In Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981), the supreme court explained that the rules governing discovery and pretrial procedure are intended to eliminate surprise and to assist our justice system in arriving at the truth in a fair and orderly fashion. In the case of witnesses who are not disclosed in accordance with pretrial ... http://www.ervingonzalez.com/trial-by-ambush/ orange color in tagalog